Damage on 34346?

Hints and tips on getting the sound you want.
Includes anything to do with Fender, Burns and other guitars; playing techniques;
also amps, effects units, recording equipment and any other musical accessories.

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby ernie1958 » 08 Jul 2012, 14:28

Speaking about going off topic...what do polepieces have to do with damage on 34346?? :lol:

Anyway,my two cents worth..I found out if you use a plain G string, which is what I gather out of all of this,the way to go is just lower the gauge of
the string.( and adjusting the height of course)
Let's say you get a standard gauge set of 9's then the G string would be 016 which is too loud compared to the B and E(first) which is the case
with pickups that have staggered polepieces.
The trick is to balance the output of each string so as to get an equal sounding whole..(read about this stuff in a lot of forums)
I put theory to practice and I must say those guys were right!
I swapped out the 016 plain G string for a 014 and it worked beautifully....much better and equal response compared with the B and E string.
Most people here use heavy gauge sets of strings but even then you can balance out if needed.
I play lots of other music besides the Shads stuff so that's why I use 9's...makes things easier if you tend to do a lot of string-bending,etc.
I'm planning on getting a few sets of 9 1/2 gauge just to see how they sound...just a little thicker on the top and bottom side of the set.
I'm convinced that you don't really need a wound G string to get a good Shads sound and they are terrible if you do string bends like i do
especially when playing country music.. :mrgreen:


Regards,
Ernie
ernie1958
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby John M » 08 Jul 2012, 21:47

Point taken about the coils on the NOS 56's, however had checked out their construction and the coils seem to be wound on a former, so the magnets don't actually touch any part of the coil, therefore a certain amount of movement can be made.
John M
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby bor64 » 14 Jul 2012, 19:56

Found these in the big archive....
Genuine 59 strat pu, just the same as on the 34346
You can clearly see the protruding G pole on the bottombobin
Attachments
59top.jpg
(21.68 KiB) Downloaded 4844 times
59back.jpg
(18.76 KiB) Downloaded 4844 times
Last edited by bor64 on 14 Jul 2012, 20:45, edited 1 time in total.
bor64
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby ecca » 14 Jul 2012, 20:27

bor64 wrote:Found these in the big archive....
Genuine 59 start pu, just the same as on the 34346
You can clearly see the protruding G pole on the bottombobin


Good smack with 'ommer soon sort that out.
ecca
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby neil2726 » 14 Jul 2012, 21:49

Is a 'ommer same as a Birmingham screwdriver Ecca?
neil2726
 
Posts: 1032
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 15:36

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby abstamaria » 15 Jul 2012, 01:42

Thanks for the photo, Rob!

Andy
User avatar
abstamaria
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: 18 Sep 2009, 03:27

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby keithmantle » 15 Jul 2012, 09:09

neil2726 wrote:Is a 'ommer same as a Birmingham screwdriver Ecca?

Screw driver/spanner
keithmantle
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby ecca » 15 Jul 2012, 10:35

Ommer's ommer ay it ?
ecca
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby Geoff Alderton LH » 16 Jul 2012, 18:09

Hi all
Yes Rob thank's for the pictures. We will get to the bottom of this "Pushed through" spec on the CRS.
Regards Geoff.
Geoff Alderton LH
 

Previous

Return to Guitars and Gear

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Ads by Google
These advertisements are selected and placed by Google to assist with the cost of site maintenance.
ShadowMusic is not responsible for the content of external advertisements.