Damage on 34346?

Hints and tips on getting the sound you want.
Includes anything to do with Fender, Burns and other guitars; playing techniques;
also amps, effects units, recording equipment and any other musical accessories.

Damage on 34346?

Postby JimN » 21 Jun 2012, 12:24

Image

A detail from a picture posted on Facebook and very obviously from a shot taken at the same session as the famous sweaters/Telecaster shot used for the front cover of the group's first LP in 1961.

Surprisingly, and even though I've seen other shots with minor chip damage to "that Strat", there appears to be a lot of damage to the front lower edge of the body. No wonder it was resprayed after Cliff got it back...

JN
User avatar
JimN
 
Posts: 4559
Joined: 17 Sep 2009, 23:39

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby hansaustria » 21 Jun 2012, 12:37

JimN wrote:Image

A detail from a picture posted on Facebook and very obviously from a shot taken at the same session as the famous sweaters/Telecaster shot used for the front cover of the group's first LP in 1961.

Surprisingly, and even though I've seen other shots with minor chip damage to "that Strat", there appears to be a lot of damage to the front lower edge of the body. No wonder it was resprayed after Cliff got it back...

JN



Resprayed is not good for the selling price - lowers the value by 20 % !


Hans
hansaustria
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby geoff1711 » 21 Jun 2012, 20:21

does a respray devalue? well yes if you or I do it, but if it's a guitar with a history and part of it's history are the refinishes, think of George Harrison's Fool guitar, and hasn't the guitar in question been resprayed more than once? wasn't it white at some point and then Bruce refinished it back to pink?

I wouldn't think all those resprays would have much effect on it's value.

Geoff
geoff1711
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby Hank2k » 21 Jun 2012, 20:48

I'd still sell my left leg for it
Hank2k
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby Uncle Fiesta » 22 Jun 2012, 00:12

George didn't have a Fool guitar, you must be thinking of Eric Claptout.
User avatar
Uncle Fiesta
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: 27 Apr 2012, 23:31
Location: near Gainsborough, England

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby 51 Relic » 22 Jun 2012, 09:02

I think Todd Rungren owns that guitar now ? with a resprayed headstock due to damage
51 Relic
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby geoff1711 » 22 Jun 2012, 10:41

Indeed Eric did have the Fool but I think you'll find George gave it to him, but I'll not go to war over it!!

Geoff
geoff1711
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby neil2726 » 22 Jun 2012, 11:10

Err I wouldnt think Mr Welch is so hard up to worry about the 20% decrease in value - cant ever see him parting with it! :)
neil2726
 
Posts: 1032
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 15:36

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby Pat Seaman » 22 Jun 2012, 12:03

I thought that 'The Fool' was a Gibson SG.................
Pat Seaman
 

Re: Damage on 34346?

Postby geoff1711 » 22 Jun 2012, 12:45

indeed it is, but I was talking refinishes in general, not just Hank Planks.

I would think any personalisation a "name" does to a guitar does not devalue it.

How about a bitsa known as Blackie.

Or an Eddie Van Halen cast off

Or John Lennon's stripped Epi's and Rick's

And around 10 or so years ago I saw a recreation of a famous Led Zep Les Paul, which from memory had been given to him and refinished, but was now too valuable to take on the road.

But I think that for probably what most of us lowly guitarists pay for our guitars, it would be cheaper to buy one the right colour than have one refinished, I know I looked at having an Eggle refinished a couple of years back and it would have cost more than what they generally fetch on Ebay,

Geoff
geoff1711
 

Next

Return to Guitars and Gear

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests

Ads by Google
These advertisements are selected and placed by Google to assist with the cost of site maintenance.
ShadowMusic is not responsible for the content of external advertisements.