barryg wrote:Bill,
Thanks for the Castle link. That's a fabulous collection and there's some aircraft there I've not seen before. Would love to go there myself sometime.
Glad the Red Arrows are getting back in the air after the crash here at Bournemouth last week. No accident details relaeased that I've heard about but I presume there were no mechanical failures found that may have affected the other Hawks.
Barry
davec wrote:Dick,
There’s some connection between Vulcan and Concorde but no conspiracy I’m afraid. It’s more a case of convergent design/evolution.
The Concorde project was born in 1954 when civil airliners were subsonic, propeller driven and with monococque/stressed skin construction. Pure-jets were the province of the military. The only pure-jet airliner at the time was the DH Comet --- and that had just been grounded because of structural problems. So any proposal for a 100 seat supersonic aircraft would have specified very powerful jet engines and very strong construction --- not “over engineered”, just “military engineered” --- and that’s exactly what happened. In effect Concorde is a military aircraft designed to carry a civilian payload. The construction of the wing and fuselage is more “hewn out of solid metal” than “assembled from parts”.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests