Is it just me ?
Although I am pretty accepting of most progressive & modern developements in the Guitar world, there are a few things that I don't feel able to participate in. I'm not too keen on some of the modern finishes on guitars, which for me were the classic instruments of my early years. You are probably around the same age group as me, growing up in the 50s/60s/70s musical eras, so suffer from the nostalgia thing for our youth. I guess it will happen to all of the following generations, as it happens to us & our parents too.
As outlined in the thread on the new 'Troy Van Leeuven' Jazzmaster, I prefer Fender finishes in the original great colours from the 50s & 60s. I don't like Black on Fenders & Squiers; although Black does look quite nice on Gibson/Epiphone, Les Pauls, 335s, Casinos etc, especially with a nice cream binding, switches & pickup covers.
I also don't care much for finishes in metallic paint, or in Greens,Bright Yellows, Dark Blues & those finishes involving stickers & stripes.
I don't like those Maple fingerboards which are pale as a corpse. Much better to have that sweet honeyed lacquer which seems to add a classy finish to any guitar, as well as some protection from dings & corrosive sweat.
As far as amps go, I welcome most modern developements, as it does add some improvement & choice to what we can use. I do still get a kick from the appearance of the traditional Marshalls, Voxes & Fender ranges. I know they are also now available in 50s/60s livery, as well as bog-standard Blacks, & also some special editions in various Whites, Greens & Reds, & that is good.
The availibility of a fantastic range of effects pedals, & even super-computer pedalboards & racks from the likes of Boss etc. are a real boon to many players. A friend of mine has had 3 different versions of the Roland 'VG' series, but he is an effects freak, & goes for it in a big way, tending to slightly get away from being primarily a Guitar player. That's not for me, personally. If I play a guitar, I do want it to sound like a guitar & not a trumpet, violin or keyboard. But I guess, they all have their place in the modern band & are very useful when gigging live.
Are we old 'stick in the muds' ........ or, is it just me ? Hmmm ........ Answers on a postcard please.
Tony.
As outlined in the thread on the new 'Troy Van Leeuven' Jazzmaster, I prefer Fender finishes in the original great colours from the 50s & 60s. I don't like Black on Fenders & Squiers; although Black does look quite nice on Gibson/Epiphone, Les Pauls, 335s, Casinos etc, especially with a nice cream binding, switches & pickup covers.
I also don't care much for finishes in metallic paint, or in Greens,Bright Yellows, Dark Blues & those finishes involving stickers & stripes.
I don't like those Maple fingerboards which are pale as a corpse. Much better to have that sweet honeyed lacquer which seems to add a classy finish to any guitar, as well as some protection from dings & corrosive sweat.
As far as amps go, I welcome most modern developements, as it does add some improvement & choice to what we can use. I do still get a kick from the appearance of the traditional Marshalls, Voxes & Fender ranges. I know they are also now available in 50s/60s livery, as well as bog-standard Blacks, & also some special editions in various Whites, Greens & Reds, & that is good.
The availibility of a fantastic range of effects pedals, & even super-computer pedalboards & racks from the likes of Boss etc. are a real boon to many players. A friend of mine has had 3 different versions of the Roland 'VG' series, but he is an effects freak, & goes for it in a big way, tending to slightly get away from being primarily a Guitar player. That's not for me, personally. If I play a guitar, I do want it to sound like a guitar & not a trumpet, violin or keyboard. But I guess, they all have their place in the modern band & are very useful when gigging live.
Are we old 'stick in the muds' ........ or, is it just me ? Hmmm ........ Answers on a postcard please.
Tony.